IELTS Academic Reading Sample 4 - A Workaholic Economy

You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-38 which are based on Reading Passage 4 below.

A Workaholic Economy

For the first century or so of the industrial revolution, increased productivity led to decreases in working hours. Employees who had been putting in 12-hour days, six days a week, found their time on the job shrinking to 10 hours daily, then finally to eight hours, five days a week. Only a generation ago social planners worried about what people would do with all this new-found free time. In the US, at least it seems they need not have bothered.

Although the output per hour of work has more than doubled since 1945, leisure seems reserved largely for the unemployed and underemployed. Those who work full-time spend as much time on the job as they did at the end of World War II. In fact, working hours have increased noticeably since 1970 — perhaps because real wages have stagnated since that year. Bookstores now abound with manuals describing how to manage time and cope with stress.

There are several reasons for lost leisure. Since 1979, companies have responded to improvements in the business climate by having employees work overtime rather than by hiring extra personnel, says economist Juliet B. Schor of Harvard University. Indeed, the current economic recovery has gained a certain amount of notoriety for its “jobless” nature: increased production has been almost entirely decoupled from employment. Some firms are even downsizing as their profits climb. “All things being equal, we'd be better off spreading around the work," observes labour economist Ronald G. Ehrenberg of Cornell University.

Yet a host of factors pushes employers to hire fewer workers for more hours and at the same time compels workers to spend more time on the job. Most of those incentives involve what Ehrenberg calls the structure of compensation: quirks in the way salaries and benefits are organised that make it more profitable to ask 40 employees to labour an extra hour each than to hire one more worker to do the same 40-hour job.

Professional and managerial employees supply the most obvious lesson along these lines. Once people are on salary, their cost to a firm is the same whether they spend 35 hours a week in the office or 70. Diminishing returns may eventually set in as overworked employees lose efficiency or leave for more arable pastures. But in the short run, the employer’s incentive is clear. Even hourly employees receive benefits - such as pension contributions and medical insurance - that are not tied to the number of hours they work. Therefore, it is more profitable for employers to work their existing employees harder.

For all that employees complain about long hours, they too have reasons not to trade money for leisure. “People who work reduced hours pay a huge penalty in career terms,” Schor maintains. “It's taken as a negative signal’ about their commitment to the firm.’ [Lotte] Bailyn [of Massachusetts Institute of Technology] adds that many corporate managers find it difficult to measure the contribution of their underlings to a firm’s well-being, so they use the number of hours worked as a proxy for output. “Employees know this,” she says, and they adjust their behaviour accordingly.

“Although the image of the good worker is the one whose life belongs to the company,” Bailyn says, “it doesn't fit the facts.’ She cites both quantitative and qualitative studies that show increased productivity for part-time workers: they make better use of the time they have and they are less likely to succumb to fatigue in stressful jobs. Companies that employ more workers for less time also gain from the resulting redundancy, she asserts. "The extra people can cover the contingencies that you know are going to happen, such as when crises take people away from the workplace." Positive experiences with reduced hours have begun to change the more-is-better culture at some companies, Schor reports.

Larger firms, in particular, appear to be more willing to experiment with flexible working arrangements...

It may take even more than changes in the financial and cultural structures of employment for workers successfully to trade increased productivity and money for leisure time, Schor contends. She says the U.S. market for goods has become skewed by the assumption of full-time, two-career households. Automobile makers no longer manufacture cheap models, and developers do not build the tiny bungalows that served the first postwar generation of home buyers. Not even the humblest household object is made without a microprocessor. As Schor notes, the situation is a curious inversion of the “appropriate technology” vision that designers have had for developing countries: U.S. goods are appropriate only for high incomes and long hours. --- Paul Walluh.

Questions 27-32
Do the following statements agree with the views of the writer in reading passage 4? In boxes 27-32 on your answer sheet write:

YES              if the statement agrees with the writer
NO                if the statement contradicts the writer
NOT GIVEN  if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this

  Example                                                                                                             Answer

During the industrial revolution, people worked harder                           NOT GIVEN

27    Today, employees are facing a reduction in working hours.
28    Social planners have been consulted about US employment figures.
29    Salaries have not risen significantly since the 1970s.
30    The economic recovery created more jobs.
31    Bailyn’s research shows that part-time employees work more efficiently.
32    Increased leisure time would benefit two-career households.

Questions 33-34
Choose the appropriate letters A-D and write them in boxes 33 and 34 on your answer sheet.

33 Bailyn argues that it is better for a company to employ more workers because
      A.    it is easy to make excess staff redundant.
      B.    crises occur if you are under-staffed.
      C.    people are available to substitute for absent staff.
      D.    they can project a positive image at work.

34 Schor thinks it will be difficult for workers in the US to reduce their working hours because
      A.    they would not be able to afford cars or homes.
      B.    employers are offering high incomes for long hours.
      C.    the future is dependent on technological advances.
      D.    they do not wish to return to the humble post-war era.

Questions 35-38
The writer mentions a number of factors that have resulted, in employees working longer hours. Which FOUR of the following factors are mentioned? Write your answers (A-H) in boxes 35-38 on your answer sheet.

List of Factors
A   Books are available to help employees cope with stress.
B   Extra work is offered to existing employees.
C   Increased production has led to joblessness.
D   Benefits and hours spent on the job are not linked.
E   Overworked employees require longer to do their work.
F    Longer hours indicate a greater commitment to the firm.
G   Managers estimate staff productivity in terms of hours worked.
H   Employees value a career more than a family.
 

Click the button to Show/ Hide Answers


For the answer explanation visit - Answer Explanation: A Workaholic Economy

 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rating 4.14 (33 Votes)

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Comments   

0 # Cristopher 2017-07-25 01:33
Hi, Could someone explain to me why in question 38 the answer is 'G'? I think that it cannot be deduced from the reading passage.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
+1 # Tammoc 2017-07-18 03:34
27 - N
In fact, working hours have increased noticeably since 1970 — perhaps because real wages have stagnated since that year.
29 - Y
In fact, working hours have increased noticeably since 1970 — perhaps because real wages have stagnated since that year.
30 - N
The current economic recovery has gained a certain amount of notoriety for its “jobless” nature: increased production has been almost entirely decoupled from employment. Some firms are even downsizing as their profits climb.
31 - YES
She cites both quantitative and qualitative studies that show increased productivity for part-time workers: they make better use of the time they have and they are less likely to succumb to fatigue in stressful jobs.
33 - C
The extra people can cover the contingencies that you know are going to happen, such as when crises take people away from the workplace.
34 - A
Automobile makers no longer manufacture cheap models, and developers do not build the tiny bungalows that served the first postwar generation of home buyers.
35 - B
Extra work is offered to existing employees. Companies have responded to improvements in the business climate by having employees work overtime rather than by hiring extra personnel.
36 - D
Benefits and hours spent on the job are not linked. Once people are on salary, their cost to a firm is the same whether they spend 35 hours a week in the office or 70
37 - F
Longer hours indicate a greater commitment to the firm. People who work reduced hours pay a huge penalty in career terms,” Schor maintains. “It's taken as a negative signal’ about their commitment to the firm.’
38 - G. Managers estimate staff productivity in terms of hours worked.
But in the short run, the employer’s incentive is clear. Even hourly employees receive benefits - such as pension contributions and medical insurance - that are not tied to the number of hours they work.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
+1 # Pabitro 2017-07-12 22:50
There are many reading samples like this one that doesn't have the 'answer explanation' section and I am afraid to say that this section is very important as it answers the question "why and where I am wrong" or "why I am right" and also it guides us as a virtual teacher which is really useful. So as a student, it is my humble request to add this section to every reading practice sample if possible.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
0 # Umesh Satashia 2017-06-14 10:18
It will be a great help to me if anyone could explain the answer to the question no. 34. Thank you in advance.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
-1 # Phuong Linh 2017-05-05 15:42
Can anybody explain "two-career households"? Thanks.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
+2 # Tiago 2017-05-30 02:17
It means both husband and wife work.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
+2 # HienDo 2017-04-11 02:21
In the last part "questions 35-38"... I only see the "List of Factors" but doesn't shows the question 35-38 at all. Please help...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
-1 # Parth 2017-02-26 08:48
Under the end of the answer.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
0 # Mohsin Raza 2017-04-01 10:46
Could someone please tell me what is the answer to the question no. 1?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
0 # Victor Chen 2017-02-09 05:00
A) Bookstores now abound with manuals describing how to manage time and cope with stress. I don't see why this is not included in the answer.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
+3 # Emma Yu 2016-11-13 08:30
Q.19 - this question is very tricky as it is listed whole paragraph 1 to describe work hours reduction. But the question is "Today".

It is requested that candidates must pay attention on details. Sometimes I feel really frustrated whenever I do reading practice. Because almost every time I do the YES/NO, TRUE/FALSE questions, it does take me lots of time to look as more details as possible. Because sometimes the answer is obvious to find, then there maybe BUT, HOWEVER to deny it. Sometimes, there is nothing to deny, I still have to spend time on looking through all just in case.

Certainly, I should not deny my English level is not good enough to take high bands.

29. stagnated= have not risen.
30. notoriety for "jobless" deny "more jobs"
31. better use of time=efficiency.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
+1 # Jo 2017-05-08 22:30
Quoting HienDo:
In the last part "questions 35-38"... I only see the "List of Factors" but doesn't shows the question 35-38 at all. Please help...

Quoting Emma Yu:
Q.19 - this question is very tricky as it is listed whole paragraph 1 to describe work hours reduction. But the question is "Today".

It is requested that candidates must pay attention on details. Sometimes I feel really frustrated whenever I do reading practice. Because almost every time I do the YES/NO, TRUE/FALSE questions, it does take me lots of time to look as more details as possible. Because sometimes the answer is obvious to find, then there maybe BUT, HOWEVER, to deny it. Sometimes, there is nothing to deny, I still have to spend time on looking through all just in case.

Certainly, I should not deny my English level is not good enough to take high bands.

29. stagnated= have not risen.
30. notoriety for "jobless" deny "more jobs"
31. better use of time=efficiency.



..... In fact, working hours have increased noticeably since 1970 — perhaps because real wages have stagnated since that year.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
+3 # Lee 2016-02-13 03:24
Where are the hints for 'F' and 'G' in the questions 35-38???? Can't seem to figure out why 'F' and 'G' are two of the answers!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
-4 # Waerden 2016-04-13 11:51
Quoting Lee:
Where are the hints for the answers 'F' and 'G' in the questions 35-38 ???? Can't seem to figure out why 'F' and 'G' are one of the answers!

sorry! F_“People who work reduced hours pay a huge penalty in career terms,” Schor maintains. “It's taken as a negative signal’ about their commitment to the firm.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
0 # Waerden 2016-04-13 11:48
Quoting Lee:
Where are the hints for F and G in the questions 35-38 ???? Can't seem to figure out why F and G are one of the answers!

F _ Even hourly employees receive benefits - such as pension contributions and medical insurance - that are not tied to the number of hours they work.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
0 # Hemant 2015-10-04 14:28
Can anybody explain the answers for question 35-38?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
0 # Thogin 2016-04-11 01:32
Even hourly employees receive benefits - such as pension contributions and medical insurance - that are not tied to the number of hours they work. Therefore, it is more profitable for employers to work their existing employees harder.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
0 # Joanna 2015-11-04 16:02
Quoting Hemant:
Can anybody explain the answer 'D' for question 35-38?


Even hourly employees receive benefits - such as pension contributions and medical insurance - that are not tied to the number of hours they work.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
+4 # Razib 2015-11-27 22:22
How is that a reason for employees working longer?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
0 # Miranda 2016-03-22 20:04
Quoting Razib:
How is that a reason for employees working longer?


Because that is one of the factors resulted in employing workers for longer hours. The employers don't have to pay extra pension and medical insurance, those fixed fees are already exciting no matter how many hours those workers have worked. If the employer hires another person to work, he/she has to pay for the new employee's pension and medical insurance, then it will be not a good deal for the company.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
0 # Sonu 2015-07-22 10:22
Hi, please explain the answer to the question 33 and answer of 'F' and 'G' from questions 35 to 38.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
+5 # Shruti 2015-07-17 07:54
Please explain the answer to the question 33.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
0 # Smr 2017-07-12 15:19
Quoting Phuong Linh:
Can anybody explain "two-career households"? Thanks.

Quoting Shruti:
Please explain the answer to the question 33.


Extra people can cover the contingencies that you know are going to happen, such as when crises take people away from the workplace.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
+3 # Linh 2015-06-18 16:21
Can somebody explain the question 29 and the answer D in the question from 35-38, please?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
0 # Chuong 2015-07-17 07:54
Quoting Linh:
Can somebody explain the question 29 and the answer D in the question from 35-38, please?

29. yes, because the real wage has stagnated. Stagnated means 'did not rise'.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
-2 # Vanina 2015-03-01 17:52
Answer #27 is wrong, in my opinion. The first two sentences state exactly the opposite. How do we know if the answers given are right?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
+2 # Sambasivarao 2015-10-07 18:19
In the 2nd paragraph, 6th line, it says- in fact, working hours have increased noticeably since 1970. That means the answer is quite opposite to the question, right?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
0 # Vjosa 2015-06-22 15:27
I think you should notice the time period. In the text, it's been mentioned 'first century' for the time while the question was saying 'today'.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
+9 # Ataklat 2015-04-08 04:53
"In fact, working hours have increased noticeably since 1970 — perhaps because real wages have stagnated since that year."
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
0 # Sahrawi 2016-07-27 09:32
I don't know where it is stated that there is a reduction. Do you know?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
0 # Ivan 2015-08-22 14:04
The utilisation of the present perfect shows that it continues nowadays.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
+1 # Stanislav 2015-03-13 02:04
Totally agree with you. There is no exact opposite statement.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
+1 # Faizan 2014-12-03 10:56
Right after the end of the reading passage, there is a tab/ button called "Show/ Hide Answers".
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
+3 # Minda 2014-06-29 01:53
Where are the answers of this reading passages?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
+3 # Simran 2014-12-14 02:24
Analysis answer for this passage multiple choice name question="Simran"]
Where are the answers of this?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote