IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample 576 - Medical service should not be run by profit-making companies

IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay:

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Present a written argument to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic:

Some people think that good health is a basic human need, so the medical service should not be run by profit-making companies. Do you think the disadvantages of the private health care outweigh the advantages?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

Model Answer:
Good healthcare service is a fundamental need for every citizen in a country and when this sector is run by money making private organisations, it is clear that the government provided health care service is not up to mark and need improvements. I believe that when the healthcare service is owned and run by some bunch of money-makers, mass people would suffer to a great extent and this policy has far more demerits than few advantages it offers.

First, when government incapable of providing sufficient treatment and hospital facilities, the healthcare sector is then turning into a profitable business sector for many private organisations. Those private organisations’ main objective is to make money and thus only rich citizens can accommodate their treatment. Since the government does not have any control over the treatment facilities of these hospitals and healthcare centres, they charge people as much as they like. Thus they make the overall health care system expensive in a country.

Second, the private healthcare centres are often accused of overcharging and wrong treatment and yet they are not punished for the misdeed they conduct. Many people opine that private healthcare centres and hospitals are far neater and clean and have more qualified doctors. However, should not those doctors be treating in public hospitals instead of making money? Thus the professional ethics of doctors are ruined by their practice in private hospitals. Furthermore, the government collects a huge amount of tax from its citizens and should be obliged to provide health care services to people for free rather than letting private hospitals loot people.

In conclusion, a better environment and more doctors and nurses in private hospitals are often considered as the great advantages for the patients.  However, the amount they charge for treatment is outrageous and mass people cannot afford that. The government should ensure proper healthcare facilities for all of its citizens and quality public health care service is a better solution than allowing private companies control this important sector whose sole objective is to make profits.

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rating 4.90 (5 Votes)

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Comments   

+2 # Sukanya 2016-03-25 06:15
Hospitals are meant to serve and cure people, but sadly these have turned into profit-oriented businesses. Because of this, there is strong opposition to let a hospital's owner or director businessman. This essay analyses the merits and demerits of private ownership and control of a hospital.

To begin with, private organisations can take quick decision to start a new hospital or improve an existing one without any bureaucratic complexities. For instance, the establishment of a government medical college hospital in India is a sophisticated process and it may take several years for the process of land acquisition. In contrast, private institutions can accelerate this process remarkably. Secondly, advanced technology and proper maintenance in private hospitals are better than that of public hospitals. Amrita Institute in Kerala is a typical example of a hospital for maintaining international standards. Thirdly, in private hospitals, hiring procedure is transparent and talented professionals work there.

In contrast, because of the astonishing treatment cost in private hospitals, deprived people cannot afford the necessary treatments. Recent newspaper reports about the death of a tribe child due to the mentality of the authority in a private hospital - reluctance to provide emergency medical services, illustrate the seriousness. In addition, they consider profit more important than the charity work. Clearly, most of the private hospitals consider the hospital as a business organisation, and their major aim is to make money. Concisely, private hospitals torch the downtrodden both mentally and economically.

To conclude, even though there are some drawbacks in the functioning of private health centres, it serves the community to a greater extent. In my opinion, the advantages of private hospitals are more important and with proper government guidance and legal regulations, disadvantages of private health care centres can be mitigated.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote