IELTS Academic Reading # 4 - A Workaholic Economy

IELTS Academic Reading Sample.

You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-38 which are based on Reading Passage 4 below.

A Workaholic Economy

For the first century or so of the industrial revolution, increased productivity led to decreases in working hours. Employees who had been putting in 12-hour days, six days a week, found their time on the job shrinking to 10 hours daily, then finally to eight hours, five days a week. Only a generation ago social planners worried about what people would do with all this new-found free time. In the US, at least it seems they need not have bothered.

Although the output per hour of work has more than doubled since 1945, leisure seems reserved largely for the unemployed and underemployed. Those who work full-time spend as much time on the job as they did at the end of World War II. In fact, working hours have increased noticeably since 1970 — perhaps because real wages have stagnated since that year. Bookstores now abound with manuals describing how to manage time and cope with stress.

There are several reasons for lost leisure. Since 1979, companies have responded to improvements in the business climate by having employees work overtime rather than by hiring extra personnel, says economist Juliet B. Schor of Harvard University. Indeed, the current economic recovery has gained a certain amount of notoriety for its “jobless” nature: increased production has been almost entirely decoupled from employment. Some firms are even downsizing as their profits climb. “All things being equal, we'd be better off spreading around the work," observes labour economist Ronald G. Ehrenberg of Cornell University.

Yet a host of factors pushes employers to hire fewer workers for more hours and at the same time compels workers to spend more time on the job. Most of those incentives involve what Ehrenberg calls the structure of compensation: quirks in the way salaries and benefits are organised that make it more profitable to ask 40 employees to labour an extra hour each than to hire one more worker to do the same 40-hour job.

Professional and managerial employees supply the most obvious lesson along these lines. Once people are on salary, their cost to a firm is the same whether they spend 35 hours a week in the office or 70. Diminishing returns may eventually set in as overworked employees lose efficiency or leave for more arable pastures. But in the short run, the employer’s incentive is clear. Even hourly employees receive benefits - such as pension contributions and medical insurance - that are not tied to the number of hours they work. Therefore, it is more profitable for employers to work their existing employees harder.

For all that employees complain about long hours, they too have reasons not to trade money for leisure. “People who work reduced hours pay a huge penalty in career terms,” Schor maintains. “It's taken as a negative signal’ about their commitment to the firm.’ [Lotte] Bailyn [of Massachusetts Institute of Technology] adds that many corporate managers find it difficult to measure the contribution of their underlings to a firm’s well-being, so they use the number of hours worked as a proxy for output. “Employees know this,” she says, and they adjust their behaviour accordingly.

“Although the image of the good worker is the one whose life belongs to the company,” Bailyn says, “it doesn't fit the facts.’ She cites both quantitative and qualitative studies that show increased productivity for part-time workers: they make better use of the time they have and they are less likely to succumb to fatigue in stressful jobs. Companies that employ more workers for less time also gain from the resulting redundancy, she asserts. "The extra people can cover the contingencies that you know are going to happen, such as when crises take people away from the workplace." Positive experiences with reduced hours have begun to change the more-is-better culture at some companies, Schor reports.

Larger firms, in particular, appear to be more willing to experiment with flexible working arrangements...

It may take even more than changes in the financial and cultural structures of employment for workers successfully to trade increased productivity and money for leisure time, Schor contends. She says the U.S. market for goods has become skewed by the assumption of full-time, two-career households. Automobile makers no longer manufacture cheap models, and developers do not build the tiny bungalows that served the first postwar generation of home buyers. Not even the humblest household object is made without a microprocessor. As Schor notes, the situation is a curious inversion of the “appropriate technology” vision that designers have had for developing countries: U.S. goods are appropriate only for high incomes and long hours. --- Paul Walluh.

Questions 27-32
Do the following statements agree with the views of the writer in reading passage 4? In boxes 27-32 on your answer sheet write:

     YES              if the statement agrees with the writer
     NO                if the statement contradicts the writer
     NOT GIVEN  if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this

Example                                                                                           Answer

During the industrial revolution, people worked harder                           NOT GIVEN

27.   Today, employees are facing a reduction in working hours.
28.   Social planners have been consulted about US employment figures.
29.   Salaries have not risen significantly since the 1970s.
30.   The economic recovery created more jobs.
31.   Bailyn’s research shows that part-time employees work more efficiently.
32.   Increased leisure time would benefit two-career households.

Questions 33-34
Choose the appropriate letters A-D and write them in boxes 33 and 34 on your answer sheet.

33.  Bailyn argues that it is better for a company to employ more workers because
      A.    it is easy to make excess staff redundant.
      B.    crises occur if you are under-staffed.
      C.    people are available to substitute for absent staff.
      D.    they can project a positive image at work.

34.  Schor thinks it will be difficult for workers in the US to reduce their working hours because
      A.    they would not be able to afford cars or homes.
      B.    employers are offering high incomes for long hours.
      C.    the future is dependent on technological advances.
      D.    they do not wish to return to the humble post-war era.

Questions 35-38
The writer mentions a number of factors that have resulted, in employees working longer hours. Which FOUR of the following factors are mentioned? Write your answers (A-H) in boxes 35-38 on your answer sheet.

List of Factors
A   Books are available to help employees cope with stress.
B   Extra work is offered to existing employees.
C   Increased production has led to joblessness.
D   Benefits and hours spent on the job are not linked.
E   Overworked employees require longer to do their work.
F    Longer hours indicate a greater commitment to the firm.
G   Managers estimate staff productivity in terms of hours worked.
H   Employees value a career more than a family.

Click the button to Show/ Hide Answers


For the answer explanation visit - Answer Explanation: A Workaholic Economy

 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rating 3.91 (47 Votes)

Armita
Hi, please add me on WhatsApp too. My number is +905436982522.
Nupur Jain
Please add me in WhatsApp group. My number is 9414088826.
Kiran
Please add me to the WhatsApp group. My number is +917204791347.
Jain
Please add me to the group. My number is +917204791347.
Alisher Amirov
Hi! Could you please add me to a WhatsApp group too? Thanks. My number is +77025013022.
Matin
Hi, could you please add me to WhatsApp group? My number is +989199676303.
Behzad
Hi, I'm Behzad from Iran and looking for a partner to improve my English. My WhatsApp number is +989153582943.
Kurrapatti Akhil
Hello.
Parnia
Could you add to your WhatsApp group, please? My number is +989134216422.
Cristopher
Hi, Could someone explain to me why in question 38 the answer is 'G'? I think that it cannot be deduced from the reading passage.
Graydon Augustus
The answer 'G' is very much in the passage. If you can't find the answer, it's because you are not able to understand paraphrase.
Tammoc
27 - N. In fact, working hours have increased noticeably since 1970 — perhaps because real wages have stagnated since that year.
29 - Y. In fact, working hours have increased noticeably since 1970 — perhaps because real wages have stagnated since that year.
30 - N. The current economic recovery has gained a certain amount of notoriety for its “jobless” nature: increased production has been almost entirely decoupled from employment. Some firms are even downsizing as their profits climb.
31 - YES. She cites both quantitative and qualitative studies that show increased productivity for part-time workers: they make better use of the time they have and they are less likely to succumb to fatigue in stressful jobs.
33 - C. The extra people can cover the contingencies that you know are going to happen, such as when crises take people away from the workplace.
34 - A. Automobile makers no longer manufacture cheap models, and developers do not build the tiny bungalows that served the first postwar generation of home buyers.
35 - B. Extra work is offered to existing employees. Companies have responded to improvements in the business climate by having employees work overtime rather than by hiring extra personnel.
36 - D. Benefits and hours spent on the job are not linked. Once people are on salary, their cost to a firm is the same whether they spend 35 hours a week in the office or 70.
37 - F. Longer hours indicate a greater commitment to the firm. People who work reduced hours pay a huge penalty in career terms,” Schor maintains. “It's taken as a negative signal’ about their commitment to the firm.’
38 - G. Managers estimate staff productivity in terms of hours worked. But in the short run, the employer’s incentive is clear. Even hourly employees receive benefits - such as pension contributions and medical insurance - that are not tied to the number of hours they work.

Pabitro
There are many reading samples like this one that doesn't have the 'answer explanation' section and I am afraid to say that this section is very important as it answers the question "why and where I am wrong" or "why I am right" and also it guides us as a virtual teacher which is really useful. So as a student, it is my humble request to add this section to every reading practice sample if possible.
Smr
Phuong Linh said :
Can anybody explain "two-career households"? Thanks.
Shruti said :
Please explain the answer to the question 33.
Extra people can cover the contingencies that you know are going to happen, such as when crises take people away from the workplace.

Umesh Satashia
It will be a great help to me if anyone could explain the answer to the question no. 34. Thank you in advance.
Tiago
It means both husband and wife work.
Jo
HienDo said :
In the last part "questions 35-38"... I only see the "List of Factors" but doesn't shows the question 35-38 at all. Please help...
Emma Yu said :
Q.19 - this question is very tricky as it is listed whole paragraph 1 to describe work hours reduction. But the question is "Today". It is requested that candidates must pay attention on details. Sometimes I feel really frustrated whenever I do reading practice. Because almost every time I do the YES/NO, TRUE/FALSE questions, it does take me lots of time to look as more details as possible. Because sometimes the answer is obvious to find, then there maybe BUT, HOWEVER, to deny it. Sometimes, there is nothing to deny, I still have to spend time on looking through all just in case. Certainly, I should not deny my English level is not good enough to take high bands.29. stagnated= have not risen.30. notoriety for "jobless" deny "more jobs"31. better use of time=efficiency.
..... In fact, working hours have increased noticeably since 1970 — perhaps because real wages have stagnated since that year.

Phuong Linh
Can anybody explain "two-career households"? Thanks.
HienDo
In the last part "questions 35-38"... I only see the "List of Factors" but doesn't shows the question 35-38 at all. Please help...
Mohsin Raza
Could someone please tell me what is the answer to the question no. 1?
Parth
Under the end of the answer.
Victor Chen
A) Bookstores now abound with manuals describing how to manage time and cope with stress. I don't see why this is not included in the answer.
Emma Yu
Q.19 - this question is very tricky as it is listed whole paragraph 1 to describe work hours reduction. But the question is "Today". It is requested that candidates must pay attention to details. Sometimes I feel really frustrated whenever I do reading practice. Because almost every time I do the YES/NO, TRUE/FALSE questions, it does take me lots of time to look as more details as possible. Because sometimes the answer is obvious to find, then there are "maybe" "but" & "however" to deny it. Sometimes, there is nothing to deny, I still have to spend time looking through all just in case.

Certainly, I should not deny that my English level is not good enough to take high bands.

29. stagnated= have not risen.
30. notoriety for "jobless" deny "more jobs".
31. better use of time= efficiency.

Sahrawi
I don't know where it is stated that there is a reduction. Do you know?
Waerden
Lee said :
Where are the hints for the answers 'F' and 'G' in the questions 35-38 ???? Can't seem to figure out why 'F' and 'G' are one of the answers!
sorry! F_“People who work reduced hours pay a huge penalty in career terms,” Schor maintains. “It's taken as a negative signal’ about their commitment to the firm.

Waerden
Lee said :
Where are the hints for F and G in the questions 35-38 ???? Can't seem to figure out why F and G are one of the answers!
F _ Even hourly employees receive benefits - such as pension contributions and medical insurance - that are not tied to the number of hours they work.

Thogin
Even hourly employees receive benefits - such as pension contributions and medical insurance - that are not tied to the number of hours they work. Therefore, it is more profitable for employers to work their existing employees harder.
Miranda
Razib said :
How is that a reason for employees working longer?
Because that is one of the factors resulted in employing workers for longer hours. The employers don't have to pay extra pension and medical insurance, those fixed fees are already exciting no matter how many hours those workers have worked. If the employer hires another person to work, he/she has to pay for the new employee's pension and medical insurance, then it will be not a good deal for the company.

Lee
Where are the hints for 'F' and 'G' in the questions 35-38???? Can't seem to figure out why 'F' and 'G' are two of the answers!
Razib
How is that a reason for employees working longer?
Joanna
Hemant said :
Can anybody explain the answer 'D' for question 35-38?
Even hourly employees receive benefits - such as pension contributions and medical insurance - that are not tied to the number of hours they work.

Sambasivarao
In the 2nd paragraph, 6th line, it says- in fact, working hours have increased noticeably since 1970. That means the answer is quite opposite to the question, right?
Hemant
Can anybody explain the answers for question 35-38?
Ivan
The utilisation of the present perfect shows that it continues nowadays.
Sonu
Hi, please explain the answer to the question 33 and answer of 'F' and 'G' from questions 35 to 38.
Shruti
Please explain the answer to the question 33.
Chuong
Linh said :
Can somebody explain the question 29 and the answer D in the question from 35-38, please?
29. yes, because the real wage has stagnated. Stagnated means 'did not rise'.

Vjosa
I think you should notice the time period. In the text, it's been mentioned 'first century' for the time while the question was saying 'today'.
Linh
Can somebody explain the question 29 and the answer D in the question from 35-38, please?
Ataklat
"In fact, working hours have increased noticeably since 1970 — perhaps because real wages have stagnated since that year."
Stanislav
Totally agree with you. There is no exact opposite statement.
Vanina
Answer #27 is wrong, in my opinion. The first two sentences state exactly the opposite. How do we know if the answers given are right?
Simran
Analysis answer for this passage multiple choice name question="Simran"]Where are the answers of this?
Faizan
Right after the end of the reading passage, there is a tab/ button called "Show/ Hide Answers".
Minda
Where are the answers of this reading passages?