Model Answer 1:

The allocation of financial resources is a matter of priority for governments worldwide. While some argue that investing in art is crucial, others contend that funds should be directed towards improving health and education. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives and provide the opinion that the health and education sectors should get priority.

Supporters of art funding argue that it plays a vital role in preserving cultural heritage and promoting creativity. Artistic endeavours, such as painting, sculpture, and music, are an integral part of a nation's identity and history. Financial support for artists and art institutions allows for the preservation of traditional art forms and the development of contemporary expressions. Additionally, art stimulates critical thinking, fosters cultural exchange, and enhances social cohesion within communities. By investing in art, societies can cultivate creativity, inspire innovation, and foster a deeper appreciation for cultural diversity.

Advocates for allocating funds to health and education assert that these sectors are fundamental to societal well-being and progress. Health is a basic human right, and investment in healthcare infrastructure, medical research, and public health initiatives is crucial for promoting a healthy population. Furthermore, education is a key determinant of social and economic development. Adequate funding for schools, teachers, and educational resources ensures that future generations receive a quality education, enabling them to acquire essential skills and knowledge for personal and societal advancement.

In my opinion, prioritizing funds for health and education is crucial. Without a healthy population and a well-educated society, the overall progress and development of a nation can be hindered. Health and education are essential building blocks for individual empowerment, social mobility, and economic growth. Once these sectors get enough priority, then a portion of the budget should go to art.

In conclusion, it is essential to prioritize investment in health and education while ensuring that art is also supported and celebrated. And then the budget could be allocated for arts. 

Sample Answer 2:

While art and culture represent a country, proper healthcare and education facilities are the two most important pillars of a nation. Thus people often have divided opinions on spending money on the "art" and "education and healthcare" sectors. This essay will discuss both these views and present an opinion that the education and healthcare sectors should get more priority.

People who advocate for spending on art opine that art is also a part of our education, tradition and heritage, and it reflects our life. It is an important sector and thus should always get priority to foster creativity and preserve our tradition and culture. They often speak about the Renaissance era and try to focus on how art contributed to the revolution for changing the world. They feel that a great portion of the budget should always be reserved for the development of art and it should never be a secondary priority.

On the contrary, another group of people feel that when a government fails to ensure proper education and healthcare facilities, as is the case in most poor and developing countries, it bears little value towards the development of art. For instance, if a person has only a few dollars and she is ill, she will purchase medicines instead of buying artwork. Similarly, a government should first focus on education and healthcare sectors, and then think about art. If art gets priority in the national budget, people would starve and suffer from the lack of healthcare services and treatment.

In pithy, I personally believe that allocating state money to different sectors in a country should be done prudently to improve the life of the citizens. And healthcare and education should always be the priority while a portion of the budget could go to art.