IELTS Essay # 921 - Old buildings should be protected by law
- Last Updated: Friday, 03 March 2023 00:53
- Written by IELTS Mentor
- Hits: 73769
IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay:
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Some people believe that old buildings should be protected by law. Others, however, think that they should be replaced by new buildings.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Model Answer 1: [Opinion: Old historic buildings should be protected by law.]
In today's world, the debate over the fate of old buildings continues to be a contentious issue. Some people argue that old buildings should be preserved and protected by law, while others maintain that these buildings should be replaced by new ones. This essay will examine both views and provide reasons why I believe that old buildings, that are important and have historic significance should be protected by law.
On the one hand, those who advocate for new buildings in place of old ones contend that old buildings are often outdated and pose a danger to public safety. These buildings may have faulty electrical systems, weak structures, and outdated plumbing, making them unsuitable for habitation. In addition, they argue that new buildings are more energy-efficient and environmentally friendly, reducing the carbon footprint and making cities more sustainable. For instance, despite their historic significance, many old structures in Japan were replaced by modern buildings to ensure safety against earthquakes.
On the other hand, those who support the preservation of old buildings argue that they have a significant cultural and historical value that cannot be replaced. Old buildings often serve as a tangible link to the past, showcasing the architectural and design trends of a particular time period. These buildings also have a unique character and charm that new buildings simply cannot replicate. Furthermore, preserving old buildings can help to maintain the identity of a city or region and attract tourists, contributing to the local economy. For instance, old towns and their medieval structures are often the main tourist attractions in our country.
In my opinion, old buildings should be protected by law. While it is true that some old buildings may need significant renovations to ensure their safety and functionality, it is important to preserve the historical and cultural significance of important old buildings. The loss of old buildings can result in the erasure of a city's cultural and architectural heritage, which is irreplaceable.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments for both sides of the debate, I believe that old buildings should be protected by law. This will ensure that their cultural and historical significance is preserved for future generations, while also contributing to boost tourism.
Model Answer 2: [Opinion: Old buildings should be replaced by new and modern buildings.]
While there is a growing movement to protect old buildings, many believe that they should be replaced by new and modern structures. While old buildings may have historical and cultural significance, I think that they often pose numerous safety risks and are no longer practical in today's society.
Firstly, many old buildings were constructed using outdated materials and techniques, making them vulnerable to collapse during natural disasters or even routine maintenance work. This not only puts the inhabitants of the building at risk but also poses a threat to surrounding areas. Replacing old buildings with new and modern ones that are built to withstand the test of time can greatly improve the safety of the people who live and work in them.
Secondly, old buildings often require extensive and costly renovations in order to meet modern safety standards and comply with building codes. This can put a strain on already limited financial resources and may not be feasible for many building owners. In addition, old buildings are often inefficient in terms of energy usage, resulting in higher utility bills and a greater environmental impact. New buildings, on the other hand, can be designed to be energy-efficient and sustainable, reducing their impact on the environment and saving money in the long run.
Finally, while old buildings may have historical and cultural significance, it is important to recognize that society is constantly evolving and changing. It is essential to adapt to new technologies and new ways of living in order to progress and thrive. Replacing old buildings with new and modern ones can provide a better quality of life for residents, attract new businesses and investment, and stimulate economic growth.
In conclusion, while old buildings may hold sentimental value, they pose numerous safety risks and are often inefficient and impractical in today's society. I believe that they should be replaced by new and contemporary structures that are safe, sustainable, and can support the needs of our constantly evolving society.