IELTS Writing Task 2/ Essay Topics with sample answer.
IELTS Essay # 1253 - Professionals should be required to work in the country where they did their training
- Details
- Last Updated: Wednesday, 28 June 2023 12:13
- Written by IELTS Mentor
- Hits: 43437
IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay:
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Model Answer 1: [View: Skilled professionals should be required to work in the country where they did their training.]
Some people believe that professionals, such as physicians, technical professionals and engineers, should be allowed to work in another country after completing their training while others opine that they should be required to work in the country where they received their education and training. This essay will explore both these views and argue that they should be required to work in the country where they completed their training.
On the one hand, those who argue for the freedom of professionals to work in any country believe that it allows for a better global exchange of knowledge and ideas. It also provides professionals with better career opportunities and the ability to work in environments that may be more suited to their personal interests and needs. Furthermore, with advancements in technology, many professionals can work remotely, which allows them to work from anywhere in the world.
On the other hand, those who argue that professionals should be required to work in the country where they completed their training believe that it helps to address the shortage of skilled professionals in their own country. For instance, in many developing countries, there is a shortage of medical professionals, and allowing them to work in other countries only exacerbates the problem. Additionally, many countries spend a lot of money and resources on the education and training of their professionals, and it is only fair that they give back to the country that provided them with the necessary education and training. To illustrate, many countries, including India, have mandatory service requirements for their medical professionals. After completing their education and training, doctors are required to serve in rural areas for a certain period.
In conclusion, while some argue that professionals should be free to work in any country they choose, I believe that they should be required to work in the country where they completed their training. This will help address the shortage of skilled professionals in many countries, while also ensuring that the country that invested in its education and training receives a return on its investment.
Model Answer 2: [View: Skilled professionals should be allowed to work in any country they wish.]
In today's globalised world, many highly skilled professionals, including doctors, IT professionals and engineers, seek to work in other countries for various reasons. While some argue that they should be required to work in the country where they did their training, others believe they should be free to work in any country they choose. This essay examines both views arguing in favour of the latter view that suggests that those professionals should have the freedom to choose where they want to work.
Proponents of the skilled professionals working in the country where they were educated and trained form their view that they have natural obligations to serve the nation that spend a considerable amount of money and effort to educate and train them. This way they repay the nation and show their gratitude. Moreover, if those professionals leave their home country and migrate to developed nations, the brain drain crisis will worsen making a vacuum for skilled professionals in developing countries further accelerating their economic and social despairs.
On the other hand, those who support allowing skilled professionals to decide where they wish to work say that doing so promotes the exchange of knowledge and skills. They keep arguing that by working in different countries, professionals can gain exposure to different cultures and ways of working, allowing them to learn new techniques and best practices that they can bring back to their home country. This can ultimately lead to better quality services and products for everyone. For instance, Indian IT professionals are renowned worldwide for their technical skills and expertise. Many of these professionals choose to work in foreign countries like the United States, where they can work alongside top-class engineers and developers, learn new techniques, and gain invaluable experience. When they return to India, they can apply their new knowledge and skills to improve the quality of work in the Indian IT industry, leading to better services and increased competitiveness in the global market. Another reason why skilled professionals should be free to work in any country they choose is that it can benefit the global economy. When professionals are able to work in countries where their skills are in high demand, they can help to boost the economy of that country as well as send back money to their home country.
In conclusion, I believe that talented and highly-skilled professionals, such as doctors, and software engineers should be free to work in any country they wish. This promotes the exchange of knowledge and skills and benefits the global economy while ensuring that they can contribute to their respective fields more effectively.
On the one hand, professionals often receive considerable funding from their government to become fully qualified to work. Therefore, it is only fair that they should repay this support by working in that country. They often do jobs that benefit society, the very society that has supported them to become the professionals that they are today. For example, the UK spends millions of pounds training junior doctors through university tuition fees and on-the-job training. So after becoming doctors and health professionals, they should repay some of the debts that they owe to the country.
On the other hand, many individuals believe that every person should have the opportunity to reach their maximum potential. There is huge demand and there is a large global market for their skills and they can command much higher salaries by moving abroad. Besides salaries, they can choose a country that values their skills and offers a conducive environment to perform optimally. If they were blocked from doing so, it would be a substantial financial and performance disadvantage for both the employees and employers. I agree that the individual’s right to work anywhere they please trumps any nationalistic consideration.
In conclusion, although there is a tremendous amount of investment in preparing skilled professionals, they should have the right to choose whether to repay that by working in their home state or moving to a region that passes them the highest value and opportunities for their skills.
Otherwise, the government as well as the people of the country will suffer most. Anyway, all people who like high efficiency should have their own choices about where they live and work.
Report