IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer (band score 8-9)
IELTS Essay # 1498 - New houses should be built in the same style
- Details
- Last Updated: Tuesday, 25 February 2025 00:19
- Written by IELTS Mentor
- Hits: 8422
IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay:
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Some people think that new houses should be built in the same style as older houses in the local area. Others disagree and say that local authorities should allow people to build houses in the styles of their own choice.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Model Answer 1: [View: new houses should be built in the same style as older houses in the local area]
In the ongoing debate about architectural styles in housing, there are those who argue that new houses should echo the established styles of older houses in the local area, while others contend that homeowners should have the freedom to build houses in styles of their choosing. This essay will delve into both these perspectives. Personally, I firmly advocate the idea that new houses should be constructed in harmony with the architectural heritage of the local area.
Opponents of uniformity in housing styles assert that allowing individuals to build houses according to their preferences fosters creativity and diversity in neighbourhoods. They argue that this approach can lead to a unique and eclectic urban landscape, reflecting the varied tastes and personalities of the residents. However, this viewpoint may overlook the potential negative impact on the overall visual coherence and historical continuity of a neighbourhood.
Conversely, adherents to the idea of maintaining a consistent architectural style argue that it preserves the cultural and historical identity of a locality. Constructing new houses in the same style as older ones helps maintain a harmonious aesthetic, preventing disjointed and visually disruptive additions. For instance, historic districts with uniform architecture often attract tourists and contribute to a sense of community pride.
Supporting the latter perspective, I believe that building new houses in the same style as older ones fosters a sense of continuity, preserving the unique character and charm of a neighbourhood. This approach not only pays homage to the architectural heritage but also ensures a cohesive and visually appealing urban environment.
To conclude, in essence, the choice of architectural styles should strike the collective preservation of local identity. Therefore, new houses in a local area should reflect the traditional and architectural styles of the old houses.
Model Answer 2: [View: local authorities should allow people to build houses in the styles of their own choice]
While some argue that maintaining architectural continuity enhances the cultural and historical fabric of a locality, others believe that allowing diversity in housing styles fosters individual expression and creativity. This essay will discuss both views. Personally, I advocate for the stance that local authorities should permit individuals to build houses in styles of their own choosing.
Proponents of adhering to traditional architectural styles argue that it preserves the character and historical identity of a community. When new houses complement the established styles, they contribute to a visually cohesive and harmonious urban environment. For instance, in historic districts where local authorities mandate uniformity, the result is often a charming and picturesque streetscape that attracts residents and visitors alike. This not only makes the area visually appealing but also boosts the economy by bringing in more tourists.
On the other hand, opponents contend that rigid regulations stifling architectural creativity limit the potential for unique and innovative designs. Allowing homeowners to choose their preferred styles encourages diversity and can lead to a more vibrant and dynamic neighbourhood. For example, modernist designs or innovative eco-friendly housing might emerge, contributing to a visually diverse and progressive urban landscape.
Supporting the perspective that local authorities should permit individuals to build houses in various styles, I believe that fostering architectural diversity allows for a more inclusive and adaptable urban development.
In conclusion, the benefits of allowing individuals the freedom to build in styles of their own choice cannot be overlooked. Local authorities should recognize the value of diversity and individual expression in architectural designs. Permitting a range of housing styles fosters a sense of creativity, adaptability, and inclusivity in urban development.
Idea Generation for this IELTS Essay:
Essay Question:
Some people think that new houses should be built in the same style as older houses in the local area. Others disagree and say that local authorities should allow people to build houses in the styles of their own choice.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Essay Type: Discussion Essay
The main question of this IELTS Essay:
Why should new houses be built in the same style as older houses in the local area?
Why should people be allowed to build houses in their own style?
What is your opinion?
Arguments for Building Houses in the Same Style as Older Houses:
Preserves cultural heritage and local identity:
Traditional architectural styles reflect a region's cultural history and heritage, which can be lost if modern, mismatched designs are introduced. Maintaining a uniform style helps preserve the area's historical charm and uniqueness. For example, in European cities like Paris, strict architectural regulations ensure that new buildings blend seamlessly with historic structures, maintaining the city's iconic appearance.
Enhances visual harmony and aesthetic appeal:
A uniform architectural style creates a visually appealing and cohesive environment. If each house were built in a completely different design, the area might look disorganized and less attractive. For instance, many heritage towns in the UK, such as Bath, have regulations ensuring that new homes adhere to classical architectural styles to maintain their picturesque charm.
Increases property value and tourism appeal:
When an area maintains a consistent architectural style, it often becomes more attractive to tourists and potential home buyers, leading to increased property values. Many people prefer living in visually harmonious neighborhoods rather than areas with clashing designs. For example, Santorini in Greece retains its signature white-washed houses with blue domes, making it a globally recognized and sought-after travel destination.
Protects historical districts from over-modernization:
Some cities and towns have historical significance, and allowing modern architectural styles can erode their historical essence. Conservation efforts ensure that local history remains intact for future generations. For instance, in parts of Kyoto, Japan, authorities prohibit ultra-modern construction to protect the city's traditional wooden houses and temples.
Creates a sense of community and belonging:
When neighborhoods have a consistent architectural style, it fosters a stronger sense of belonging and pride among residents. People often feel more connected to their surroundings when their environment maintains a traditional and familiar look. For example, in small English villages, residents take pride in preserving the classic countryside cottages, reinforcing a sense of local identity.
Arguments for Allowing People to Build Houses in Their Own Style:
Encourages creativity and personal expression:
Allowing homeowners to design houses according to their preferences fosters creativity and innovation in architectural design. People should have the freedom to express their individuality through their living spaces. For example, in Dubai, many luxury villas are built in unique and futuristic designs, showcasing the homeowners' distinct preferences and architectural creativity.
Adapts to modern needs and technological advancements:
Traditional housing styles may not always accommodate modern lifestyles and technological advancements, such as energy-efficient designs, smart home systems, and sustainable materials. Modern architecture allows for better functionality and efficiency. For instance, many homeowners now prefer eco-friendly houses with solar panels and energy-saving features, which may not align with older architectural styles.
Promotes architectural diversity and modernization:
A mix of traditional and modern architecture can create a dynamic and evolving cityscape. Diverse designs showcase different eras of development, making cities more vibrant and reflective of changing times. For example, cities like London feature a blend of historic buildings and modern skyscrapers, demonstrating a balance between preservation and progress.
Provides flexibility in construction costs and materials:
Some traditional styles require expensive materials and construction techniques, making them financially unfeasible for many homeowners. Allowing flexibility in design enables people to choose cost-effective options that suit their budgets. For instance, using prefabricated materials in modern housing can significantly reduce construction costs compared to maintaining intricate traditional designs.
Caters to changing family structures and housing needs:
Modern lifestyles often require different housing layouts, such as open-plan living spaces, multi-functional rooms, or additional storage. Older styles may not always accommodate these requirements efficiently. For example, contemporary housing designs often feature larger windows and open layouts to maximize natural light and ventilation, improving overall living conditions.
Report