Model Answer:
Education is the backbone of a nation and the development of a country largely depends on its educational policy. The rapid development of the world and the ever-increasing competition are two reasons so many young students and professionals are looking for university education these days. The high cost of university education is still a reason many talented individuals cannot afford to get a higher degree and I strongly believe that it should be the government’s responsibility to make the education free and bear the expenses of university education.

First, the government has a huge budget for the development of education sector and the money could be better utilised by ensuring university education for talented individuals. The government already funds the public university education and taking full responsibility of the cost would ensure quality education for all. The difficult admission process in the university level filters out the talented students to take part in university education and they should be backed up by the government funds to let them concentrate on their studies. In order to encourage graduate students and professionals to further their education government should pay for their courses as it would bring more benefits in the future for the country. Many European countries have already implemented this method and they have a huge number of skilled professionals who not only serve the country but also the whole world.

More importantly, when citizens would be assured that the government will bear the cost of their children’s university education, they would be more interested in preparing their children for the university degree rather than sending them to work and earn. This would have a tremendous effect on the education level of the whole country. By supporting university course fees, the government would create more skilled professionals and without them, the development of the nation is quite impossible in this ever-accelerating era or science and technology. This is an effective method to drive more motivated and talented young towards the higher education and preparing them to take the leadership of the nation.

In conclusion, paying for the university course fees by the government is indeed an effective measure for ensuring quality education for talented individuals and for an overall progress of a nation. It is a symbol of prosperity, better education policy and reassuring the citizens. So I reaffirm that the university education costs should be paid by the government.

Exact/ Almost Similar topic:

Some people think that the government should make university education free for all students, regardless of their financial situation. 

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Sample Answer:
In recent years, the cost of higher education has become a major concern for students and their families. Some people argue that the government should take steps to make university education free for all learners, while others believe that students should be responsible for paying their own way. In my opinion, while there are certainly advantages to making university education free, it is ultimately not a feasible solution.

On the one hand, making university education free for all students has a number of advantages. Perhaps the most significant advantage is that it would increase access to higher education, particularly for those from low-income families. This would help to reduce economic inequality and promote social mobility. Additionally, it would ensure that all students have an equal opportunity to pursue their dreams and achieve their potential, regardless of their financial situation.

There are also several disadvantages to making university education free. Firstly, it would be extremely expensive for the government, and would require significant increases in taxation. This could lead to a number of negative economic consequences, such as reduced investment and innovation. Secondly, it could lead to a devaluation of degrees, as more people would hold them, reducing their value in the job market. Finally, it could also lead to a reduced quality of education, as universities would not have the same financial resources to invest in teaching and research.

In conclusion, while state-funded university education for all students has some benefits, it is ultimately not a practical solution. Instead, governments should focus on creating financial aid programs that help to reduce the burden of student debt for those who need it most, while still maintaining the value and quality of higher education.