IELTS Essay 1192 - It is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research

IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay:

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.



Sample Answer 1:
In this era of "freedom of speech and democracy", restricting information for the sake of vague public security and national importance seems quite irrational to many when others opine that information should be available only when the authority deem them suitable for access. Both parties have their reasons for arguments, and I personally believe that the scientific studies, academic arena, and businesses can be greatly benefitted if all information is made open to them.

To begin with, sensitive information, that could penetrate state security, lead to public outcry, hand over technologies to terrorists and facilitates corporate monopoly in the trade sector, deserves to be scrutinized before making them public. In this digital era, information spread like wildfire and for the sake of maintaining global peace, it should be delimited, according to many. For instance, if nuclear technology is shared with all nations for scientific studies, the world will soon stand on the verge of obliteration, despite an inconceivable possibility this technology possesses to facilitate the citizens.

On the contrary, scientific research largely depends on available data and previous discoveries. If valuable information and past findings are not shared openly with academics and researchers, global progress will become standstill. For instance, the Internet is probably the most significant invention the modern world has produced and if this technology had not been shared by the US military, we would still be living in the pre-internet era. Moreover, clandestine information has no value if it is not implemented in the real world and thus curbing them is like slaughtering the potential for progress. Finally, world history suggests that the human race has advanced due to discoveries and inventions shared with the world as each finding went through profound modification and advancement. I thus personally favour the ideology that supports "free information for all".

In conclusion, information has limited value when it is curbed and not shared with great minds. For true global progress, restriction on valuable information should be debarred and let people know the truth instead of keeping them in dark.

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rating 4.29 (47 Votes)

Batman
Write about the following topic:

Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Sample Essay:
In general, sharing information is essential in any aspect of life, and many people contend that it needs to be circulated across all spheres actively. However, some people argue that not all information can be freely distributed due to its value, sensitivity and importance. In this essay, I will try to weigh both of these options. However, I believe that it should be determined based on the type of information we are talking about.

Whether information should be freely disseminated or guarded strictly, depends on its nature. For instance, knowledge in the academic world must be open to everyone and easily accessible. School children and students must enjoy the benefits of open information to attain knowledge and professional qualifications. A similar approach applies to science and business, where learning from the experiences of previous generations and successful entrepreneurs will benefit the prosperity of the society at large and ultimately the whole world.

Alternatively, more careful consideration should be given to the information that can potentially harm the emotional and physical well-being of people and have negative impacts on social stability and peace. Such risks can occur on scales that go beyond just one society or country and affect the whole world. A vivid example can be observed with the current worldwide controversies regarding vaccination and different vaccines, which eventually mislead and confuse whole countries thus preventing them from taking timely measures to protect their populations. Likewise, it can pose a significant danger if scientific data such as the information on nuclear weapons, hazardous substances or chemicals are possessed by the wrong people or groups.

To conclude, whether it is good to share as much information as possible depends on the nature of it. The knowledge that is beneficial to people and mankind at large should be disseminated freely whereas the information that poses threat to people, society and the world must be handled with caution and consideration.

Mery
It is commonly suggested by many that the freely accessible data in scientific research, business and academic environment is beneficial. Some others, however, do not support this view. In my opinion, free knowledge gives a wide opportunity for humankind for progress and to educate people, on one hand, and gives more stimulation to develop the economy of the country on the other hand.

It is not a secret that two heads are better than one. In the same way, the collaboration of all well-educated people and freely accessible information give more chance for scientific discoveries by solving serious problems. One key benefit is the economic approach by creating a new type of ideas and solutions. This can lead to increasing idea through people and engaging more people to solve problems. Wikipedia, for example, is a collection of data contributed by all and freely accessible by all. Furthermore, it has given a platform for sharing information through the internet and became a new kind of trend. Had the initiate to make it open for all was not taken, it could never have been useful for all.

However, some negative aspects of sharing information freely must be considered. One important issue is to prevent terrorists from getting sensitive information that can lead to the loss of human life or destruction of property. Ill motives to create a monopoly in business or creating artificial market demands by gaining secret information should also be prevented. Finally, businesses must not share their client information due to privacy concern.

In conclusion, information has more benefits and become more useful when they are shared and used for human progress. So it is expected that more information will be made publicly accessible except for those that might lead to catastrophe.

Bhajneek Bajwa
If valuable information and past findings are not shares openly to academics and researchers, the global progress will standstill.

"shares" is wrong here, it should be "shared". "Shared openly to" is incorrect, instead it should be "shared openly with".

Dayal Ghosh
Well written essay.
Dhairya
I think the points in the essay are taking a different direction. The task achievement and the phrases are not relevant to the essay.
Dipshikha Shrestha
Why cannot you write in an easy and understandable format???
Smith
Task achievement of this essay is not more than 6.5, also, many points are irrelevant.