IELTS Writing Task 2/ Essay Topics with sample answer.
IELTS Essay # 1320 - Governments should lower arts budgets to allocate money to education
- Details
- Last Updated: Saturday, 15 July 2023 11:38
- Written by IELTS Mentor
- Hits: 6357
IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay:
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Governments should lower arts budgets to allocate more money to education.
Do you agree or disagree with this view?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Model Answer 1: [Agreement]
The allocation of government budgets is a topic of constant debate, particularly when it comes to balancing funding for arts and education. Some argue that the government should lower arts budgets to allocate more money to education, and I am inclined to agree with this viewpoint. This essay will present arguments in favour of reducing arts budgets and redirecting funds towards education, highlighting the importance of prioritising educational investments for the future of a nation.
One compelling reason to lower arts budgets in favour of education is to enhance educational resources and opportunities for students. Adequate funding for education ensures access to quality teaching, modern facilities, and updated learning materials. By directing more financial resources towards education, governments can support the training and development of skilled teachers, invest in educational technology, and provide well-equipped classrooms. This, in turn, improves the overall educational experience and fosters a conducive environment for students' academic growth. For example, Finland, renowned for its high-quality education system, emphasises the importance of investing in education by consistently allocating significant portions of its budget to support schools, teacher training, and student welfare. This commitment to education has contributed to Finland's success in international education rankings.
Moreover, investing in education has long-term benefits for economic growth and workforce development. By prioritising education funding over arts funding, governments can ensure that the workforce is equipped with the necessary knowledge and skills to thrive in a competitive global economy. A well-educated workforce is crucial for innovation, entrepreneurship, and attracting investment. South Korea provides a noteworthy example of the positive impact of prioritising education. The country's heavy investment in education, particularly in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), has propelled its economic growth and contributed to its technological advancements.
In conclusion, while the arts play an important role in society, I believe that reducing arts budgets and allocating more funds to education is a prudent decision. Enhancing educational resources and opportunities will contribute to the development of knowledgeable individuals, promote economic growth, and foster a skilled workforce.
Model Answer 2: [Disagreement]
The allocation of government budgets is a matter of careful consideration, and the question of whether to lower arts budgets in favour of education is a complex one. While some argue for reducing arts budgets, I respectfully disagree with this view. This essay will present arguments in favour of maintaining arts budgets, emphasising the importance of supporting the arts as a valuable and essential component of a well-rounded education.
One crucial reason to maintain arts budgets is the role of the arts in fostering creativity and self-expression. The arts provide a platform for individuals to explore their imagination, express their emotions, and think critically. By engaging in artistic pursuits, students develop important skills such as problem-solving, communication, and collaboration. These skills are not only valuable in artistic domains but also transferable to various aspects of life and work. For instance, a study conducted by the Americans for the Arts organization found that students who participate in arts education programmes demonstrate higher levels of creativity, critical thinking, and self-confidence compared to those without access to such programmes. These findings underscore the importance of preserving arts budgets to nurture the holistic development of students.
Moreover, the arts play a vital role in preserving cultural heritage, promoting diversity, and fostering social cohesion. Through various artistic forms such as visual arts, music, and dance, individuals can celebrate and appreciate different cultures. By maintaining arts budgets, governments can support cultural institutions, festivals, and community initiatives that showcase diverse artistic expressions. This exposure to diverse cultural experiences encourages mutual understanding, respect, and empathy among individuals from various backgrounds. For example, the Smithsonian Institution in the United States, funded through government support, offers a range of cultural programmes and exhibitions that celebrate the country's diverse heritage. These initiatives not only provide educational opportunities but also contribute to a sense of national pride and inclusivity.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that reducing arts budgets in favour of education would be a misguided approach. The arts are not only essential for fostering creativity, self-expression, and critical thinking but also for promoting cultural enrichment and diversity. By maintaining arts budgets, governments can ensure a well-rounded education that nurtures the holistic development of students and fosters a society that values creativity and cultural understanding.
Report