IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer (band score 8-9)
IELTS Essay # 1468 - Some cities have vehicle-free days
- Details
- Last Updated: Thursday, 10 April 2025 08:44
- Written by IELTS Mentor
- Hits: 9559
IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay:
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Some cities have vehicle-free days when private cars, trucks, and motorcycles are banned from the city centre. People are encouraged to use public transportation such as buses, taxis, and metro on vehicle-free days.
Do the advantages of having vehicle-free days outweigh the disadvantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Model Answer 1: [View: Advantages outweigh disadvantages]
In numerous urban areas worldwide, the concept of vehicle-free days has gained momentum, promoting the restriction of private cars, trucks, and motorcycles within city centres. On these days, citizens are urged to utilize public transportation like buses, taxis, and metros as an alternative. In my opinion, the advantages of this practice far outweigh the drawbacks it may have.
It is undeniable that this approach may present several drawbacks. The inconvenience caused to individuals who heavily rely on private vehicles for their daily commute could lead to dissatisfaction. Moreover, businesses that depend on deliveries or transportation for their operations might face logistical challenges, potentially impacting their productivity. For instance, courier companies tasked with timely deliveries of perishable goods or essential supplies to various city businesses could encounter delays during vehicle-free days, affecting their ability to meet customer demands.
However, this practice brings several benefits. The primary advantage of vehicle-free days lies in mitigating environmental pollution and reducing traffic congestion. By limiting the number of private vehicles traversing the city centre, there is a substantial decline in harmful emissions, contributing to cleaner air and reduced noise pollution. Moreover, this temporary ban can alleviate traffic congestion, providing smoother movement for public transportation, cyclists, and pedestrians, thereby improving overall road safety. Finally and most importantly, it encourages some people to try public transportation or ride a bicycle which may change their attitude towards solely using private cars.
Based on the discussion, it can be inferred that the advantages of vehicle-free days significantly outweigh the disadvantages. The positive impact on the environment, public health and attitude, and reduced traffic congestion in city centres can lead to sustainable urban development.
In conclusion, while vehicle-free days may pose some minor inconveniences, their overarching benefits in terms of environmental sustainability, changing people's perceptions about using public transport, and reduced traffic congestion make them a worthwhile initiative for cities to adopt.
Model Answer 2: [View: Disadvantages outweigh advantages]
In an attempt to reduce urban pollution and congestion, some cities have introduced vehicle-free days during which private automobiles and motorcycles are restricted in central areas. Although this initiative has certain environmental and social advantages, I believe the drawbacks outweigh the benefits due to the inconvenience it causes and its limited long-term impact.
On the one hand, banning private vehicles temporarily can improve air quality and reduce noise pollution. Without the usual stream of traffic, city centres become cleaner and quieter, offering residents a break from the typical urban chaos. Additionally, such initiatives promote the use of public transport and environmentally friendly alternatives like cycling or walking, which may contribute to healthier lifestyles. For instance, in Bogotá, Colombia, the annual “Car-Free Day” has led to a measurable drop in air pollution for that 24-hour period.
However, these benefits are often short-lived and come at the cost of public inconvenience. Many commuters rely on private vehicles for flexibility, especially those with children, the elderly, or long commutes. Public transportation, while available, may not meet the increased demand during these days, leading to overcrowding and delays. Moreover, local businesses frequently report a decline in customer visits due to reduced accessibility. For example, shop owners in some European cities expressed concern that foot traffic dropped significantly during initial trials of car-free initiatives and that is negative for their businesses.
In conclusion, while vehicle-free days may offer temporary environmental relief and raise awareness about sustainable transport, they often disrupt daily routines and fall short of offering long-term solutions. Therefore, I believe the disadvantages of this practice outweigh the advantages.
Model Answer 3: [View: Advantages outweigh disadvantages]
The urban landscape pulsates with life but is often choked by the throes of traffic. In response, some cities have embraced the concept of car-free days, temporarily banishing private vehicles from their hearts. While disruptions and inconveniences arise, the environmental and societal benefits paint a compelling picture, suggesting that the advantages of these car-free initiatives outweigh the disadvantages.
Objections to car-free days often cite disruptions to daily routines and economic concerns. Businesses fear decreased foot traffic, while commuters grapple with navigating alternative transportation. These drawbacks deserve consideration. For example, shop owners in central Madrid initially reported a drop in customer visits when car-free zones were introduced, citing reduced accessibility as a major concern.
However, the most immediate and tangible benefit is a dramatic improvement in air quality. With exhaust fumes abating, car-free days offer city dwellers a taste of pure air, reducing harmful pollutants and allergens. This translates into immediate health benefits, particularly for vulnerable populations like children and the elderly. Furthermore, car-free days unlock the potential for vibrant public spaces. Reclaimed streets become pedestrianised playgrounds, buzzing with activity. Street performers entertain, vendors display their wares, and families enjoy picnics and leisurely strolls. This fosters a sense of community and belonging, transforming the city centre from a congested thoroughfare into a place for human interaction and shared experiences. For instance, some European cities saw their car-free day morph into a massive street food festival, drawing in locals and tourists alike, and injecting vitality into the city's core.
In conclusion, while car-free days are not without their challenges, the advantages they offer paint a compelling picture. Improved air quality, vibrant public spaces, and a strengthened sense of community stand as weighty benefits, outweighing the inconveniences faced by businesses and commuters.
Idea Generation for this IELTS Essay:
Essay question:
Some cities have vehicle-free days when private cars, trucks, and motorcycles are banned from the city centre. People are encouraged to use public transportation such as buses, taxis, and metro on vehicle-free days.
Do the advantages of having vehicle-free days outweigh the disadvantages?
Essay type:
Advantages and Disadvantages Essay.
The main question of this essay:
Do the advantages of car-free days in city centres outweigh the disadvantages?
Advantages outweigh disadvantages:
1. Reduces air and noise pollution:
With fewer vehicles on the road, cities experience a notable drop in carbon emissions and noise levels, improving the environment for residents. For instance, cities like Paris report significant air quality improvements on vehicle-free days.
2. Encourages healthy habits:
Walking and cycling become more appealing when roads are safer and less congested. This can promote healthier lifestyles. For example, during vehicle bans in Bogotá, more people take to bicycles and walking, contributing to public health.
3. Promotes environmental awareness:
These initiatives educate the public on the environmental impact of private transport and can inspire long-term behaviour change. For instance, repeated car-free days have led to more sustainable transport choices in parts of Scandinavia.
4. Enhances public spaces:
When roads are free from cars, cities can organise cultural events and markets, creating a more lively and engaging urban experience. For example, many European cities host open-air concerts or community festivals during car-free days.
5. Safer urban environment:
Fewer vehicles reduce the risk of accidents, making streets safer for pedestrians and cyclists. For instance, pedestrian injury rates dropped during car-free weekends in Jakarta’s city centre.
Disadvantages outweigh advantages:
1. Inconvenience for commuters:
Many people rely on private vehicles for commuting, especially in cities where public transport is inefficient or unreliable. For example, in cities like Manila, banning vehicles causes delays and frustration due to limited alternatives.
2. Impact on local businesses:
Reduced vehicle access can discourage customers from visiting city-centre stores, especially for those who rely on convenience. For instance, retailers in Madrid reported sales drops during car-free weekends.
3. Temporary environmental benefits:
The reduction in emissions lasts only a short time, offering minimal long-term impact unless paired with broader sustainability policies. For example, one-day bans in Delhi had little effect on overall pollution trends.
4. Increased burden on public transport:
Sudden demand spikes can overwhelm buses and trains, resulting in overcrowding and delays. In cities like Mumbai, vehicle-free days have led to major transport congestion on metro lines.
5. Accessibility challenges for vulnerable groups:
Elderly people, parents with young children, or people with disabilities may struggle to travel when cars are not permitted. For instance, in some cities, patients missed medical appointments due to car restrictions.
Report