Academic IELTS Writing task 1 Sample 64 - Proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in UK

IELTS Academic Writing Task 1/ Graph Writing - Pie Chart:

» You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.

The pie chart below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in the UK in 2002.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

» Write at least 150 words.

Proportion of UK families living in poverty in 2002


Model Answer 1:
The pie chart outlines the percentages of poor family types in the United Kingdom in 2002. Generally speaking, 14% British households were insolvent in 2002 and half of those poor families were sole parents and singles without any child.

As can be seen, 26% sole parents in the United Kingdom were economically insolvent in 2002 and this was the highest ratio for the poor British family types. Poverty was prevalent among the singles without children as 24% of them were under the poverty line. These two types of households accounted for half of the total poverty-stricken families in the UK in 2002.

Couples with children had greater poverty rate than couples without children. While the 15% former family types witnessed economic misfortune, the latter accounted for 9% of such households. It is worth noticing that ages British had fewer poverty rates than their younger counterparts. One in twenty aged couples had to go through financial hardships while it was 7% for the single aged person.

 

Sample Answer 2:
The pie chart shows data on the different family types under the poverty line in the year 2001 in the UK. As is presented in the graph, sole parents and single person without children were the highest in percentages who lived in the destitute condition in the UK in 2002.

According to the pie chart, people in the UK who were poor mostly fell under sole parent category in 2002. This was the highest, more than one quarter, among the given categories of families who lived in paucity. The second largest segment who were needy were the single person without any child and their percentage was 24%. Couples with children had 15% poverty rate while it was less than 10% for single aged people, aged couple and couples with children.

In this year, 14% of all household in the UK were living in poverty. Interestingly, aged people had less percentage of poverty and couples with children enjoyed better economic condition than the couples without children.

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rating 3.71 (14 Votes)

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Comments  

+3 # Bipin Sharma 2017-09-03 11:35
The pie chart provides information about the percentage of people in the United Kingdom from each household type living in poverty in the year 2002. Overall, the majority of single people, with or without children, were suffering from destitution while the aged couple who suffered from insolvency were comparatively less in percentage.

According to the illustration, about half of the single people with or without children were below the poverty line in the year 2002 in the UK. Similarly, 15% couples having children in this year were not able to live comfortably due to weak economic conditions.

Couples without any children living in poverty in 2002 accounted for 9% of total population in the United Kingdom. Aged people, whether single or staying together with family members, were suffering least financially - 12% of these family type. Less than one-fifth people from all households were passing their days in difficulties due to poverty in the same year in the UK.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
+1 # Daniel 2016-04-09 13:02
This chart gives no sense to me. The deadline talks about the proportion of families, whereas in the chart itself there is 'proportion of people from each household'. Household does not implicitly mean family, does it?

The next thing I do not understand are the proportions... How there can be included 14% of 'all household'?

Either the pie chart shows the percentage share of different people living in poverty or it shows the percentage of those of impoverished in each of 7 groups given.

In any case, this gives me no sense. Moreover, I do not understand why you provide sample answers which are irrelevant and not correct.

This website is great, but a lot of people (including me) can find some sort of things very misleading. Also it would be great, if you could provide each writing task with real sample answer, so people can use it as an inspiration and not just any 'sample answers' where there is a massive fail straight at the very beginning: ...in 2001

Thank you, good luck!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote