IELTS Writing Task 2/ Essay Topics with sample answer.
IELTS Essay # 1213 - Environmental problems that the world is facing are so great
- Details
- Last Updated: Thursday, 06 July 2023 02:38
- Written by IELTS Mentor
- Hits: 136732
IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay:
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
The environmental problems that today's world is facing are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation. So governments and large organizations should be responsible for reducing the amount of damage being done to the environment.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Model Answer 1: [Disagreement]
Governments, environmentalists and large organisations, in many countries, are trying to curb environmental problems, and a part of this effort is to make people aware of environmental issues. It is surprising how our dietary habits or even the dresses we wear can all contribute to environmental problems. So, without involving ordinary citizens, government bodies and private organisations can not reverse the downward fall when it comes to the environment.
To commence with, without creating awareness among ordinary citizens, it is impossible to achieve environmental protection. We, as ordinary citizens, are constantly contributing to global warming, pollution and climate change. To illustrate, the cars we drive exhaust carbon dioxide, the dresses we wear require a large amount of fibres and water, the plastic bags we use end up in the water, and even the diets we follow can impact the climate. Thus, if people are not cognizant of their actions that are directly or indirectly responsible for global warming, they will not fully comprehend the gravity of the intricacies and feel responsible. Climate change is so big a problem that only governments and large organizations can not work to find a solution, and a coordinated effort is required.
It is undeniable that countries have taken serious steps to curb environmental problems, and our leaders meet frequently to discuss it. Restrictions are in place on gas emissions, fossil fuel use, plastic production and use, and alternative sources of green energy are being invested upon. But if the efforts are not made at an individual level, the magnitude of damage and pollution would far outstrip the efforts. To cite an example, scientists, engineers, environmentalists and the authority may come out with proposals and invest money in research, but they can not control the amount of plastic bags we use and throw away without recycling. Every environmental problem is related to our human lifestyle and unconsciousness, so it is high time to include the syllabus about environmental protection in our school. We have got only one planet to live on, and we must save it.
In conclusion, whatever we do to the environment will return and affect us. So all levels of education should emphasize how we can be more responsible in protecting it. A joint approach by the authority and mass people can only make it happen.
Sample Answer 2: [Partially Agreement - A collaborated approach is required.]
Nowadays, environmental issues have become bigger and more crucial than at any time in the past. Some believe that authorities, large firms and manufacturers can play a fundamental role in reversing the detrimental damages done to the environment while ordinary people have little to contribute. From my perspective, although the government and large companies must take immediate actions to save the earth, people have an important role to play.
The earth is confronting devastating threats, and it is imperative to take some radical moves by the authorities immediately. For example, authorities should dedicate a large amount of budget to improve the public transport infrastructures and enact strict regulations and laws regarding usage or ownership of private vehicles. They generate a considerable volume of greenhouse gases, which are considered the main culprit behind global warming. Moreover, it should be compulsory for companies to be based on renewable resources of energy for their productions. Also, they should limit their productions to the proportion of demand because mass production not only threatens the natural resources but is also primarily responsible for endless rubbish and harmful pollutants that overwhelmingly harm nature.
In addition to the actions required by the government and organisations, people need to be active in saving the mother planet. Little choices they make can have a big impact. To cite an instance, the way we dispose of our household waste can make a difference. If we separate the biodegradable and non-biodegradable garbage from the origin, from homes, it will effectively reduce the recycling strain, which is profoundly time, money, and energy-consuming. Furthermore, the more they become aware of the environment and understand how crucial it is to protect it, the more sustainable and healthier the world becomes.
In conclusion, governments and large companies must initiate immediate and radical actions for the sake of the earth's survival, and people still can play a significant role in diverse aspects of the earth's well-being.
[Written by - Mahsa]
Sample Answer 3: [Agreement]
Every country in the world is suffering from some sort of environmental crisis, which is exacerbating each year. In my view, individual effort is less significant in reducing such damages; hence, the government, international organisations and big corporations should come forward to tackle this ever-increasing global warming and environmental issues.
Environmental damage is an intricate issue that primarily results from careless industrialisation. Most factories release chemicals into the environment without any treatment and emit CO2. So, they are liable for such devastating environmental degradation, and they should pay all the money to reinstate the environment. To give an example, according to the World Economic Forum, industrial wastes are the key reason for the contemporary ecological collapse, and it comprises 70% of the world’s pollutions. Since industries are primarily responsible for global warming, they should be made liable to invest to reverse it.
Moreover, pollution is wreaking havoc in all countries. As countries are inextricably connected, they can not deny their duties to resolve the issue. When the iceberg in Antarctica melts, it increases the risks of floods in the lower sea-level countries like Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and the Maldives. Interestingly, 80% of global warming is happening due to excessive fuel usages in developed countries. So rich countries should reduce their fuel consumption to limit the global temperature rise so that other countries become free from any environment-related jeopardies. Governments, international organisations and large corporations have the means and capacity to tackle it internationally, and ordinary people can do little to enact international laws or take effective initiatives to reverse the damage done.
In conclusion, the intensity of the environmental damages has reached its peak, so individual efforts cannot change it significantly. In fact, large organizations and governments should resolve the issue because they are responsible for most of the damages, and they have the means to control it.
[Written by - Amin Rahman]
Model Answer 4: [Disagreement]
Humans have been degrading the earth ever since we realised our capability to harness nature. As a result, we are facing environmental issues that have gone beyond our control. Despite coordinated efforts by environmentalists and governments, the downward spiral has hardly been reversed. And, environmental problems are not only the liability of the government and big organisations, but it is also everyone’s duty to protect, nurture and care for the mother earth.
To begin with, problems associated with the environment today are getting worse, and the earth is being polluted not only because of large industries or factories but also because of us - ordinary people. Every action we, as ordinary citizens, take also has an impact on our environment. For example, the use of plastic is a common cause of environmental contamination and no matter how many times the government bans the use of plastic, the havoc it causes to the environment will not stop unless mass people stop using it. We have to realise how significant it is to protect our environment, and deciding to carry bags made from fibres or biodegradable materials could be an initial step.
Moreover, the government can not decide to stop industrialisation as that would severely hamper a country's GDP. On top of that, large corporations are mostly after their business profit rather than caring for the environment. So if we rely on such organisations to reverse the damage caused to nature, we would only be imprudent in the long run. We need to step forward and vow to save the only planet we have for us and our future generation. For instance, large organisations or the local authority can plant trees to a certain extent, and it will not have a drastic impact unless and until people start planting trees in their spare space and on the rooftop.
To conclude, considering the increase in overall environmental damages in recent years, the earth will become inhabitable soon. To save our planet and the human race from becoming extinct, we all should join our hands together and work towards the common goal of reducing the damage to our environment.
[Written by - Jaya Gera]
Model Answer 5: [Agreement]
Environmental degradation and its effects on earth has become a matter of great concern in today's world. Some individuals argue that ordinary people can do little to improve the situation, I firmly agree and believe that governments and large organizations should take responsibility for reducing the amount of damage being done to the environment.
Firstly, it is important to recognize that individuals alone cannot make significant progress in addressing environmental problems. For instance, the carbon footprint of tens of thousands of people is lower than that of a large corporation that owns several factories. Large corporations are responsible for a significant portion of the pollution that is damaging the environment. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the government to introduce and enforce regulations that will force these corporations to reduce their carbon footprint and operate in a more sustainable manner.
Secondly, it is essential for governments to lead the way in the development of new technologies that can help to reduce the impact of human activities on the environment. Research and development in areas such as renewable energy and green technologies are expensive and require substantial investment. Therefore, governments and large organizations are better placed to undertake this research and invest in the necessary infrastructure.
Moreover, governments can also play a crucial role in raising awareness about environmental issues among the public. Through public education campaigns, governments can encourage people to make more environmentally friendly choices, such as reducing their use of single-use plastics or taking public transport instead of driving. Such initiatives can have a noteworthy impact in reducing environmental damage.
In conclusion, the environmental problems that the world is facing today are significant, and it is the responsibility of governments and large organizations to take action to reduce the amount of damage being done to the environment. While individuals can make small changes to reduce their carbon footprint, significant progress can only be made if governments and corporations take responsibility for their impact on the environment.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the world is facing many environmental hazards; some of which are too enormous to be solved by individual efforts. Some people claim that it is the responsibility of the national authorities and large organizations to decrease environmental-related disasters. However, it is my contention that everyone, including ordinary citizens to large corporations and the government, should take accountability to heal the world again.
First of all, everyone has the responsibility to reduce environmental deterioration because the Earth is shared by all. In some countries, local villagers and some businessmen cut the trees down for farming, for housing, and for selling the trees to earn money, leading to deforestation, drought and flood. Individually, people should be aware of the actions that would harm the Earth, while the local authority should impose restrictions on people's activities that may hurt the natural equilibrium.
Moreover, governmental bodies should play their roles to regulate the laws concerning environmental issues. Environmental problems have been caused by individuals, authorities and large companies, these are also accumulative effects from abuse of natural resources for long term and large skills. Some nation-wide logging, industrial or manufacturing cooperation have used to rule their authorization for their profits that may lead to detrimental consequences to the environmental health. Therefore, these organizations should take their commitments and the government should charge these companies if their actions cause any harm to the environment, by setting the environmental laws.
To conclude, present environmental problems have great impacts on all of us. If the responsibility of saving the planet is shared by all - from individuals to governments - we would be able to save the planet we live in.
First of all, when we start protecting the environment by taking little initiatives and making little efforts, this can bring a huge change. Let us take a simple example of turning off the water tap when we brush our teeth. It is overwhelming how much water it can save. If everyone starts doing this, we will be able to save millions of gallons of water each year. There are thousands of examples like this, like turning off the lights when not in use, limiting the use of refrigerators and so on. This outlines how individual efforts can accumulate to a greater role when it comes to saving our environment.
Secondly, plastic is an enormous threat to our environment and we can limit the use of plastic through personal choice and awareness. Recycling plastic is also a good option. If we start using recycled paper bags from right now, we will notice significant improvements in the coming years. One more thing we can do is plant more and more trees in our home, garden or locality and encourage others to do so.
In the end, I would like to say that small changes will bring drastic changes. So giving up is not the solution and blaming others or making them responsible for the betterment of our future is not wise.
On one hand, governments and big companies can take a plethora of initiatives such as making proper waste treatment units for chemical producing companies. This will not only save rivers from getting polluted but also protect the life of endangered sea species. In addition to this, building these treatment plants will reduce the effects of highly contaminated and perilous chemicals and then the waste can be discharged to a safe place. For instance, certain countries, like Sweden, have already come up with strict regulations on waste treatments and it is showing a noticeable difference in the quality of water. All in all, taking these measures will eventually create a better and safer place to live.
On the other hand, ordinary people can also show their support by growing plants near their living areas which will aid us in reducing the amount of carbon dioxide from the environment. Moreover, this will also set an example for adolescents to take care of their own world. For example, citizens of Croatia have commenced planting trees in greenfield zones and the difference can be realised by examining the latest stats.
To recapitulate, In my view, the federal government and large associations can decline the graph of pollution by making treatment units, although individuals should also come up with diverse initiatives like plantations in their surroundings.
On one hand, governments and big companies can take a plethora of initiatives such as making proper waste treatment units for chemical producing companies. This will not only save rivers from getting polluted but also protect the life of endangered sea species. In addition to this, building these treatment plants will reduce the effects of highly contaminated and perilous chemicals and then the waste can be discharged to a safe place. For instance, certain countries, like Sweden, have already come up with strict regulations on waste treatments and it is showing a noticeable difference in the quality of water. All in all, taking these measures will eventually create a better and safer place to live.
On the other hand, ordinary people can also show their support by growing plants near their living areas which will aid us in reducing the amount of carbon dioxide from the environment. Moreover, this will also set an example for adolescents to take care of their own world. For example, citizens of Croatia have commenced planting trees in greenfield zones and the difference can be realised by examining the latest stats.
To recapitulate, In my view, the federal government and large associations can decline the graph of pollution by making treatment units, although individuals should also come up with diverse initiatives like plantations in their surroundings.
First of all, governments should lead the process of limiting environmental degradation and making it greener. This can essentially be achieved by introducing and imposing laws that would force people to embrace eco-friendly habits and refrain from bad ones that would damage our planet. This is important because not all people share the same level of awareness in regards to environmental issues, and no matter how noble their awareness is, they may still not feel obliged to follow good environmental routines. A simple example of this I can recall is when the law enforcement personnel in my country stopped penalising people for the use of plastic bags, mass people started using prohibited plastic bags which ultimately harm the ecosystem and disrupt the marine species.
Moreover, large organizations and social groups should play a significant role in combating environmental damages. Their primary role should be working on increasing people's level of awareness. Government's laws are not sufficient and will not work in all situations. So, awareness combined with tough legislation can achieve the best outcomes. If we go back to the plastic bag example, we would notice that awareness plays an important role in changing people's behaviour. For those who started using it, had they been convinced of its importance, they would not have done that.
In conclusion, to ensure positive contributions and to minimize risks to the planet, relying on people alone will not lead to the desired results. Governments' work complimented with large companies' effort can effectively help protect the environment.
Retrospective studies about this issue have produced many significant results and they exhibit that in bygone years, environmental affairs were not as substantial as it is today. Different choices that ordinary people make in their lives like the food they buy, beverages they drink, clothes they were, the way they purchase their groceries, or even the programme they watch also affect the environment one way or another. For instance, when a person decides to buy organic fruits, it can make a difference in the carbon footprint he or she makes from that decision. This is why the government should involve ordinary citizens to become aware of the global warming issues and how environmental degradation affects their life. Once they are included in the programmme and initiatives, things can start becoming better.
Moreover, since more than 70 percent of environmental pollutions is due to industrializati ons, which increases when we build more industries, global leaders should decide where we should be heading from here. We need industries for jobs, manufacturing, and economic progress, but the government must decide at what environmental costs this progress should go on. It needs a balance and strict regulation where government alone can intervene. For instance, if the government makes regulations that every industry needs to produce green power to run their machines or continue their manufacturing, it can be a game-changer.
To conclude, ordinary people have a lot to contribute and the government should include them to fight the environmental problems and to reverse the process. However, in some areas, like making regulations to force industry owners to produce green power, the government has to make initiatives alone to contribute towards a safer and greener world.
Our green planet has been severely impacted by industrialisati on and human activities. It is so vast an issue that an ordinary person can do almost nothing to change it like stopping the global temperature from rising which require global leaders' initiatives. For instance, a person can plant a tree or reduce her daily carbon footprint but can never decide to make all people in her city use electric cars instead of fossil-fuel driven automobiles. This is where the government and global leaders have to come forward and take steps. If they decide, no fossil-fuel driven cars can run on the roads. It makes clear how authority and large organisations have to decide and take steps to reverse the environmental issues.
The government should be the primary body to act against the destruction caused to the atmosphere. Unplanned growth of industrialisati on should be remodelled and waste management should be fully controlled by authorities. Renewal of the waste and recycling should be done by the government using induced methods. They should legislate new regulations and laws and make sure individual people follow them. For instance, it has been proven that many people abide by many laws for the fear of punishment rather than their natural obligations. Thus the authority should make sure mass people abide by rules and laws to save the environment.
To conclude, some people alone cannot make a drastic change when it comes to making the planet safer and stopping climate change. So in order to have a green ecosystem, the government and other large organizations should introduce new methods to ensure having a healthy world for survival.
Report